#### Contents

The coefficient of subgrade reaction is defined as the ratio between the pressure against the footingÂ or mat and the settlement at a given point expressed asÂ The coefficient of subgrade reaction is defined as the ratio between the pressure against the footing or mat and the settlement at a given point expressed as Â eq 14.2

1 . The value of k^ is independent of the magnitude of pressure.

2. The value of &s has the same value for every point on the surface of the footing.

Both the assumptions are strictly not accurate. The value of ks decreases with the increase ofÂ the magnitude of the pressure and it is not the same for every point of the surface of the footing asÂ the settlement of a flexible footing varies from point to point. However the method is supposed to Â give realistic values for contact pressures and is suitable for beam or mat design when only a lowÂ order of settlement is required.

## Factors Affecting the Value of ks

Terzaghi (1955) discussed the various factors that affect the value of ks. A brief description of his

arguments is given below.

Consider two foundation beams of widths Bl and B2 such that B2 = nB{ resting on aÂ compressible subgrade and each loaded so that the pressure against the footing is uniform and equal

to q for both the beams (Fig. 14. Ib). Consider the same points on each beam and, let

y1 = settlement of beam of width B1

y2 = settlement of beam of width B2

where ks is the coefficient of subgrade reaction of a long footing of width B meters and resting on stiff clay; ksl is the coefficient of subgrade reaction of a long footing of width 0.30 m (approximately), resting on the same clay. It is to be noted here that the value of ksl is derived from ultimate settlement values, that is, after consolidation settlement is completed.

If the beams are resting on clean sand, the final settlement values are obtained almost instantaneously. Since the modulus of elasticity of sand increases with depth, the deformation characteristics of the sand change and become less compressible with depth. Because of this characteristic of sand, the lower portion of the bulb of pressure for beam B2 is less compressible than that of the sand enclosed in the bulb of pressure of beam Bl.

The settlement value y2 lies somewhere between yl and nyr It has been shown experimentally (Terzaghi and Peck, 1948) that the settlement, y, of a beam of width B resting on sand is given by the expression

where y{ = settlement of a beam of width 0.30 m and subjected to the same reactive pressure as the

beam of width B meters.

Hence, the coefficient of subgrade reaction ks of a beam of width B meters can be obtainedÂ from the following equation

where ks1 = coefficient of subgrade reaction of a beam of width 0.30 m resting on the same sand.

## Measurement of ks1

A value for ks1Â for a particular subgrade can be obtained by carrying out plate load tests. TheÂ standard size of plate used for this purpose is 0.30 x 0.30 m size. Let k1 be the subgrade reaction forÂ a plate of size 0.30 x 0.30 rn size.

From experiments it has been found that ks1=k1 for sand subgrades, but for clays ksl varies

with the length of the beam. Terzaghi (1955) gives the following formula for clays

## Procedure to Find ks

**For sand**

1. Determine k1 from plate load test or from estimation.

2. Since kss1 =~ k1 use Eq. (14.6) to determine ks for sand for any given width B meter.

**For clay**

1 . Determine k1 from plate load test or from estimation

2. Determine ks1, from Eq. (14.7a) as the length of beam is known.

3. Determine ks from Eq. (14.4) for the given width B meters.

When plate load tests are used, k{ may be found by one of the two ways,

1. A bearing pressure equal to not more than the ultimate pressure and the correspondingÂ settlement is used for computing k1

2. Consider the bearing pressure corresponding to a settlement of 1.3 mm for computing kr

## Estimation of k1Values

Plate load tests are both costly and time consuming. Generally a designer requires only the values

of the bending moments and shear forces within the foundation. With even a relatively large error in

the estimation of kr moments and shear forces can be calculated with little error (Terzaghi, 1955);

an error of 100 per cent in the estimation of ks may change the structural behavior of the foundation

by up to 15 per cent only.

In the absence of plate load tests, estimated values of k1 and hence ks are used. The valuesÂ suggested by Terzaghi for k1 (converted into S.I. units) are given in Table 14.1.

### Related Posts

### Revisions

There are no revisions for this post.

## No comments yet.